Q&A
More Common Myths Debunked
When the math doesn't math
PITT
Q&A
The Table: Historical Patterns of Exclusionary Rhetoric
What This Section Addresses: A common response to evidence-based critiques of trans exclusion is to dismiss them as “false equivalence” or historically inaccurate comparisons. Critics argue that anti-trans arguments are fundamentally different from historical discrimination because the categories involved are different. This section examines whether the mechanism of exclusion follows
Essays
The Mirage of Protection
How Gatekeeping Becomes the Wound We Inflict on Ourselves
Inconvenient Truth
Part 6: The "Good Trans Person" Con
When Acceptance Means Submission
Inconvenient Truth
Part 5: The Capital 'T' Truth About Lowercase Bigotry
Debunking Sasha Ayad's Denial-Based Identity
letters
When "No" Is a Complete Sentence: Why We Need to Stop Platforming Bigotry
A somewhat raw and unpolished update to you all
Inconvenient Truth
Part 4: Incomplete Is Their Middle Name
How Ayad Misrepresents Affirming Care
Inconvenient Truth
Part 3: Seven Principles of Psychological Warfare
Decoding Ayad's Conversion Manifesto
Inconvenient Truth
Part 2: Are You Smart Enough to Be Manipulated?
Ayad's Audience Grooming Tactics
Q&A
List of Bad Arguments by Transmisic Activists
1. Claim: "There is no objective evidence that proves the condition of 'being transgender' is anything but a belief" * Logical fallacy: Appeal to ignorance (claiming something is true because it hasn't been proven false) * Why it's incorrect: This dismisses substantial scientific evidence
Inconvenient Truth
Part 1: The Metaphor That Murders Truth
Manufacturing Confusion from Complexity
Satire
Local Parents Hold Press Conference to Announce They Are Actually the Oppressed Ones
They Demand Flag and Persecution Recognition