More Common Myths Debunked
When the math doesn't math
When the math doesn't math
What This Section Addresses: A common response to evidence-based critiques of trans exclusion is to dismiss them as “false equivalence” or historically inaccurate comparisons. Critics argue that anti-trans arguments are fundamentally different from historical discrimination because the categories involved are different. This section examines whether the mechanism of exclusion follows
How Gatekeeping Becomes the Wound We Inflict on Ourselves
When Acceptance Means Submission
Debunking Sasha Ayad's Denial-Based Identity
A somewhat raw and unpolished update to you all
How Ayad Misrepresents Affirming Care
Decoding Ayad's Conversion Manifesto
Ayad's Audience Grooming Tactics
1. Claim: "There is no objective evidence that proves the condition of 'being transgender' is anything but a belief" * Logical fallacy: Appeal to ignorance (claiming something is true because it hasn't been proven false) * Why it's incorrect: This dismisses substantial scientific evidence
Manufacturing Confusion from Complexity
They Demand Flag and Persecution Recognition